Conan the…Master Painter?
Wag Exhibit presents cartoons as high art
Kristen Pauch-Nolin
Many artists became interested in art while drawing and re-creating
comic-book and funny-page characters.
Indeed, the lines and colours of Superman, Conan the Barbarian
and political cartoons have provided generations of aspiring
visual practitioners with both graphic material and inspiration.
Funny Papers: Marvel Comic, Canadian Political Cartoons and
Contemporary Art?, on display at the Winnipeg Art Gallery (WAG)
beginning May 27, celebrates the evolution of image production
and its influence over artistic practice by offering samples
from the WAG’s permanent collection. Made up of drawings,
illustrations, assemblage pieces and sculpture that span more
than three decades, the show provides patrons with an opportunity
to see work which has seldom been seen before.
Exhibition curator Mary Reid describes the show as a revisiting
of the debates that have surrounded the hierarchical distinctions
made between art and illustration. She contends that the pieces
included in Funny Papers demonstrate how contemporary art has
effectively blurred the two, forcing both artists and audiences
to “reconsider the relevance of such an argument today.”
A large portion of the show comprises work that was originally
included in one of three exhibitions at the WAG in the 1970s.
The structure of Comics (1973), Canadian Political Cartoons
(1977) and Steranko: Graphic Narrative (1978) all offered an
impressive sampling of illustrations and drawings executed by
the best practitioners of the time.
The Structure of Comics introduced the idea of ‘high’
vs. ‘low’ art by exhibiting a collection of comic-book
images borrowed and eventually purchased directly from Marvel
Comics in New York. The display of comic-book art in the formal
gallery implicitly elevated illustration to a position equal
to that of sculpture or painting.
Many of the more than 50 pieces that composed the exhibit —
including work by legends of comic-book illustration —
are back on display in Funny Papers. Original drawings by Rich
Buckler of The Avengers, Sal Buscema of Captain America, Gil
Kane of The Mighty Thor and John Romita Sr. of The Amazing Spider-Man
once again serve to illustrate the significance of the illustration
genre and demonstrate its place in the development of contemporary
art history.
Select drawings from Steranko: Graphic Narrative, similarly
give audiences an opportunity to see original renderings executed
by a legend of comic-book illustration. James Steranko, an American
icon, is best known for his ’60s Marvel strip Nick Fury,
Agent of S.H.I.E.L.D. Described by critics and historians as
one of Marvel’s greatest visionaries, Steranko is credited
as the innovator of sequential art during the Silver Age of
Comics, a period spanning the mid-’50s to the early ’70s,
as superheroes evolved and became more human.
The art of illustration is also represented by a selection of
pieces from Canadian Political Cartoons, which was originally
displayed at the WAG in 1977. Featuring images created by Winnipeg
Free Press editorial cartoonist Peter Kuch and Duncan Macpherson
of the Toronto Star, the drawings serve to document Canadian
history between the early ’60s and the mid-’70s.
Featuring caricatures of and visual commentaries on many of
Canada’s most prominent figures, such as prime ministers
John Diefenbaker, Joe Clark and Pierre Trudeau, the pieces continue
the idea of visual narratives. Here, the individual drawings
provide insight into the most significant personalities of the
day, and as a collection they reveal the political climate of
an era.
The images selected from these three seminal exhibitions have
not been shown at the WAG since their debuts in the ’70s.
In fact, Reid came upon them quite by accident.
“I was poking around in the collection one day and accidentally
came across this stuff and did a little investigation. It was
quite surprising to find this stuff hidden in the vault,”
she says.
Determined to create a relevant exhibition comprising works
exclusively from the collection, Reid combined the selected
vintage pieces with more current works. The question mark following
‘Contemporary Art’ in the show’s title suggests
her rationale.
Reid explains: “Making the title into a question has various
motivations — i.e., would you consider comic books and
political cartoons art? Contemporary art draws a lot on comic
books and the notion of graphic narrative. Why is that significant?
Does it make this type of contemporary art less ‘serious’
than conceptual art? What makes ‘Art’ with a capital
A?”
These questions are answered by Reid’s positioning of
contemporary artwork that uses the subjects and approaches of
comic books and political cartoons right alongside the actual
source drawings. The combination demonstrates the tremendous
impact the illustration genre has had and continues to have
on current artists such as the members of the Royal Art Lodge
(RAL), Jordan Van Sewell, Sheila Butler, Laurent Roberge, Pierre
Ayot and Otmar Alt.
Sheila Butler’s piece Spider Man steps out of TV, from
1983, includes a reference to comic books in its title, while
the connection in Van Sewell’s Ship of Fools is in the
piece’s humour. Specifically referencing Van Sewell’s
work, Reid describes the art as infused with “irony, parody,
satire and innuendo,” a comment as easily applied to any
of the contemporary work in Funny Papers.
Mockery and sarcastic criticism similarly define the work of
fellow Winnipeggers and RAL members Drue Langlois, Michael Dumontier
and Marcel Dzama. Each creates comics or action-figure dolls
as part of artistic practice. Represented here by at least one
signature piece each, the successful young artists are further
evidence of Reid’s thesis.
Perhaps the most surprising pieces are the contributions by
Roberge, Ayot and Alt. These works transform comics and cartoons
into conceptually based pieces. Ayot’s Untitled (Winnipeg
Free Press) from 1980 appears as installation, Alt’s Coq
o’clock as figurative sculpture and Roberge’s The
Funnies (Les Comiques) as assemblage. Representing the far reach
of illustration’s influence, the pieces demonstrate the
numerous and unexpected possibilities that artists will undoubtedly
continue to find in graphic print. |